Reasoning of State (Cambridge Studies in International Relations)
Cambridge University Press, 2/14/2019
EAN 9781108446181, ISBN10: 1108446183
Paperback, 370 pages, 22.8 x 15.2 x 1.8 cm
Language: English
Scholars and citizens tend to assume that rationality guides the decision-making of our leaders. Brian C. Rathbun suggests, however, that if we understand rationality to be a cognitive style premised on a commitment to objectivity and active deliberation, rational leaders are in fact the exception not the norm. Using a unique combination of methods including laboratory bargaining experiments, archival-based case studies, quantitative textual analysis and high-level interviews, Rathbun questions some of the basic assumptions about rationality and leadership, with profound implications for the field of international relations. Case studies of Bismarck and Richelieu show that the rationality of realists makes them rare. An examination of Churchill and Reagan, romantics in international politics who sought to overcome obstacles in their path through force of will and personal agency, show what less rationality looks like in foreign policy making.
Introduction
three theoretical arguments, four 'great men' of history, multiple methods, and disciplines
1. The psychology of rationality
cognitive style in international relations
2. The three 'r's of international relations
realism, romanticism and rationality
3. Little Bismarcks
a laboratory experiment on variation in rational thinking and rational behavior
4. The 'prince' among men
Bismarck's realpolitik in Prussian politics
5. Cold blood and iron
Bismarck, the struggle with Austria and German unification
6. Blind faith
Richelieu, the devoted, and France in counter-reformation Europe
7. 'Blood, toil, tears and sweat'
Churchill, romanticism and the rational appeasement debate
8. 'In defeat, defiance'
Churchill in words (1935–39) and in deeds (1940) with Therese Anders
9. 'Beginning the world all over again'
resolving the paradox of Ronald Reagan
10. Winning one as the Gipper? Reagan's administration and American engagement with the Soviet Union
Conclusion
the irrationality of rational choice
saving a paradigm from itself
References
Index.