The Creation of Lancastrian Kingship: Literature, Language and Politics in Late Medieval England (Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature)
Cambridge University Press, 10/18/2007
EAN 9780521874960, ISBN10: 0521874963
Hardcover, 202 pages, 22.8 x 15.2 x 1.9 cm
Language: English
The arguments used to justify the deposition of Richard II in 1399 created new forms of political discussion which developed alongside new expectations of kingship itself and which shaped political action and debate for centuries to come. This interdisciplinary study analyses the political language and literature of the early Lancastrian period, particularly the reigns of Henry IV (1399–1413) and Henry V (1413–22). Lancastrian authors such as Thomas Hoccleve and the authors of the anonymous works Richard the Redeless, Mum and the Sothsegger and Crowned King made creative use of languages and idioms which were in the process of escaping from the control of their royal masters. In a study that has far-reaching implications for both literary and political history, Jenni Nuttall presents a fresh understanding of how political language functions in the late medieval period.
Introduction
Part I. Household Narratives
1. Stereotyping Richard and the Ricardian familia
2. The dissemination of the Ricardian stereotype
3. Politicizing pre-existing languages
4. From stereotypes to standards
5. Household narratives in Lancastrian poetry
Part II. Credit and Love
6. Promises, expectations, explanations and solutions
7. A discourse of credit and loyalty
8. Credit and fraud in Hoccleve's regiment
Conclusion. Lancastrian conversations
Bibliography.
Review of the hardback: 'Nuttall's book is dense, thorough, and technically proficient ... So Nuttall's book deserves credit for a monograph that will long be the last word on its subject. She is the painstaking chronicler of an age of discontent. All those concerned with politics and literature between the 1930s and early years of Henry V will then have to take account of her work. ... The Creation of Lancastrian Kingship is, then, a book for historians of poetry and historians of politics. The former will thank her for wading through reams of official documentation (calendars of close rolls, proceedings of privy councils, and so on) to extract valuable data. The latter will find it in discussions of poetry altogether more expert and penetrating than those of some previous writers. Together, then will learn more readily what the poets of a turbulent epoch have to tell them, and understand the world better in which those poets lived.' Modern Language Review