The Death of Herod: An Essay in the Sociology of Religion
Cambridge University Press, 9/10/1992
EAN 9780521414821, ISBN10: 0521414822
Hardcover, 212 pages, 21.6 x 14 x 1.6 cm
Language: English
This 1992 work is intended to be a 'taster' to sociological method for students of the New Testament. Richard Fenn demonstrates how fruitful the relationship between the social sciences and biblical studies can be when sociological method is imaginatively applied to the New Testament. Fenn's point of departure is the particular historical event of the death of Herod the Great. He focuses on Josephus' account of the trials of Herod's sons, the death of Herod himself, and the crisis of succession which followed his death. Josephus' account is shown to provide a rich sociological resource, in that he observes how speech was used to conceal rather than to convey individuals' true interests and commitments. His account also reveals the failure of the trial as a critically important institution for restoring confidence in public discourse. The result, the author argues, is the intensification of conflict within, and between, generations, at every level of Palestinian society.
1. Two methodological viewpoints
the priestly and the prophetic
2. Description, interpretation, and explanation
modes of analysis
3. Levels of observation and of analysis
making the right choices
4. 'What is going on here?' The role of the observer and the beginnings of theory
5. The search for useful concepts
evil and charisma
6. The making of a theory.
"The author has chosen a useful way in which to present the sociologist's craft to the reader. Zeroing in on a particular set of circumstances keeps the book from becoming a dull, theoretical account, and Fenn adds to the appeal of the book by making a number of observations about NT passages that parallel or exemplify what he finds in Josephus's reports....it is instructive to see what happens when a familiar text is viewed through eyes that are trained to see phenomena differently than a traditional historian might." James Vanderkam, Critical review